Skip to main content
· 7/31/1896

McLaughlin v. San Francisco & San Mateo Railway Co.

Citations

  • 113 Cal. 590
  • 45 P. 839
  • 1896 Cal. LEXIS 829

Syllabus

<p>Negligence—Damages—Indebtedness Incurred for Physician—Expenditure—Pleading—Evidence — Variance.—In case of personal injury of a plaintiff through the negligence of the defendant, under a proper .pleading the injured party may recover for such necessary medical expenses as he may have become liable to pay, though not in fact paid before suit brought; but where the complaint avers that plaintiff has necessarily expended a specified sum in doctor’s bills, he cannot prove that he has incurred a physician’s bill, or recover the amount thereof under such pleading.</p>

Judges: Searls

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.