McLaughlin v. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• writing in a gender discrimination case that 17 “the admissibility of ‘me too’ evidence hinges on how closely related the evidence is to the 18 plaintiff’s circumstances and theory of the case”
• “FEHA requires employees to prove that they are 17 qualified individuals under the statute just as the federal ADA requires.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).