McLaughlin v. Estate of Charles Rosenberg, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “spontaneous descriptions of events made substantially contemporaneously with the observations are admissible if the descriptions are sufficiently corroborated by other evidence”
• holding that “spontaneous descriptions of events made substantially contemporaneously with the observations are admissible if the descriptions are sufficiently corroborated by other evidence”
• holding that \spontaneous descriptions of events made substantially contemporaneously with the observations are admissible if the descriptions are sufficiently corroborated by other evidence\
• finding the admission of two 911 tapes to be in accordance with New York’s present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule
• taped 911 call described perpetrators and apprehension of them by the police; police arrived three minutes after call was initiated
• taped 911 call described perpetrators and apprehension of them by the police; police arrived three minutes after call was initiated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).