McLaughlin v. Elsberry, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a municipal defendant “cannot be vicariously liable under Monell unless one of [its] employees is primarily liable under section 1983 itself”
• noting that a nonmoving party “cannot simply reassert factually unsupported allegations” to overcome summary judgment
• noting that a nonmoving party “cannot simply reassert factually unsupported allegations” to overcome summary judgment
• noting that the nonmoving party cannot simply assert factually unsupported allegations to meet burden at summary judgment
• noting that a nonmovant “cannot simply reassert factually unsupported allegations contained in its pleadings”
• holding, on the authority of Celotex v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).