McLaughlin v. CitiMortgage, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that legal arguments based on these two theories alone justify the filing of a Motion to Dismiss, as they have been “universally and emphatically rejected by numerous federal courts for at least the last 25 years”
• providing detailed can demand that government officials explanation of the redemptionist theory and rejecting it
• describing a sovereign citizen’s argument that a lender “lend[s] the money that was created by the citizen’s signature [on the promissory note] back to the citizen-borrower”
• discussing these theories in depth and collecting cases that “universally and emphatically” reject them
• discussing these theories in depth and collecting cases that “universally and emphatically” reject them
• collecting cases and describing legal theories facially similar to some of those espoused by the Debtors in this case as frivolous, patently ludicrous, universally rejected, and a waste of tax dollars

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).