McLandrich v. Southern California Edison Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “applying the ‘ultrahazardous activities' doctrine here would be clearly inconsistent with the Price–Anderson Act.”
• noting that “applying the ‘ultrahazardous activities’ doctrine here would be clearly inconsistent with the Price-Anderson Act.”
• noting that “applying the ‘ultrahazardous activities’ doctrine here would be clearly inconsistent with the Price-Anderson Act.”
• noting that “applying the ‘ultrahazardous activities’ doctrine here would be clearly inconsistent with the Price— Anderson Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).