McLain v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court's modification of pre-trial orders was not an abuse of discretion
• comparing D.R.E. 602 and 702 and distinguishing between personal observations and expert testimony
• ‘When a witness testifies based on their own experience, knowledge and observation about the facts in the case, they are not giving “expert testimony,” as that term is defined by the rules of evidence^]”
• comparing D.R.E. 602 and D.R.E. 702

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).