· 12/4/1946
McLain Line, Inc. v. United States
Citations
- 69 F. Supp. 938
- 1946 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1863
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- contracting officer's acceptance of a bid proposal that was not fully responsive did not constitute abuse of discretion
- involving the Navy rescinding a bid contract and awarding it to a different bidder
- only where agency action has “no rational basis” or upon a showing of “clear illegality” may federal court enjoin government procurement decision
- permissible for an agency to accept a bid having a computation formula different from the one contained in the solicitation proposal where difference was of form, not substance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennedy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.