Skip to main content
· 12/4/1946

McLain Line, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 69 F. Supp. 938
  • 1946 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1863

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • contracting officer's acceptance of a bid proposal that was not fully responsive did not constitute abuse of discretion
  • involving the Navy rescinding a bid contract and awarding it to a different bidder
  • only where agency action has “no rational basis” or upon a showing of “clear illegality” may federal court enjoin government procurement decision
  • permissible for an agency to accept a bid having a computation formula different from the one contained in the solicitation proposal where difference was of form, not substance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennedy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.