McKoy v. United States Postal Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court ruled correctly that the judgment debtor was not 16 entitled to hearing under § 3202(d)
• concluding that district court ruled correctly that the judgment debtor was not 26 entitled to hearing under § 3202(d)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).