Skip to main content
· 1/18/1996

McKown v. State

Citations

  • 915 S.W.2d 160
  • 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 177
  • 1996 WL 16001

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that complaint regarding recusal of trial court judge should not be addressed until appeal from final judgment
  • holding that courts of appeals lack jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals of pretrial orders regarding excessive bail or denial of bail
  • holding that complaint regarding recusal of trial court judge should not be addressed until appeal from final judgment
  • holding that appellate court does not have jurisdiction to review appellant’s claims based on law of the case and due process/due course of law because they may be addressed on direct appeal
  • stating that an interlocutory appeal from the denial of a motion to reduce bond is permitted
  • stating that an interlocutory appeal from the denial of a motion to reduce bond is permitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Livingston, Dauphinot, Richards

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.