Skip to main content
· 8/3/2005

McKnight v. Evancheck

Citations

  • 907 So. 2d 699
  • 2005 WL 1812775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that an evidentiary hear ing is not necessary on a motion to dismiss for fraud where neither party requests such a hearing
  • affirming a dismissal for fraud on the court based on medical records and where neither party requested an evidentiary hearing
  • affirming the trial court's dismissal for fraud even though no evidentiary hearing was held
  • affirming dismissal for fraud on the court where trial court found plaintiff “lied about his extensive medical history, which had a direct bearing on his claim for damages”
  • affirming the dismissal of McKnight’s complaint for fraud on the court based on McKnight’s omission of an extensive medical history, which, if it had gone undiscovered, would have interfered with the jury’s ability to fairly adjudicate the issues
  • “the trial court was within its discretion to determine that the misrepresentations made by [plaintiff] permeated the case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.