Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/3/1994

McKissick v. Frye

Citations

876 P.2d 1371
255 Kan. 566
1994 Kan. LEXIS 100

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that a chiropractor’s testimony was sufficient to establish with a reasonable certainty the need for plaintiff to receive future chiropractic care
opposing counsel’s remarks are reversible error if the parties have not had a fair trial
“[Tjhere is no provision in current law for comparison of one plaintiffs recovery with another’s to serve as the basis for overturning a jury’s verdict.”
where one party introduces an inadmissible fact into evidence, the other party may introduce a similar inadmissible fact to remove an unfair prejudice which might otherwise result
“[T]here is no provision in current law for comparison of one plaintiff’s recovery with another’s to serve as the basis for overturning a jury’s verdict.”
appellate courts not to weigh evidence or evaluate credibility of witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.