McKissick v. Frye

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a chiropractor’s testimony was sufficient to establish with a reasonable certainty the need for plaintiff to receive future chiropractic care
• opposing counsel’s remarks are reversible error if the parties have not had a fair trial
• “[Tjhere is no provision in current law for comparison of one plaintiffs recovery with another’s to serve as the basis for overturning a jury’s verdict.”
• where one party introduces an inadmissible fact into evidence, the other party may introduce a similar inadmissible fact to remove an unfair prejudice which might otherwise result
• “[T]here is no provision in current law for comparison of one plaintiff’s recovery with another’s to serve as the basis for overturning a jury’s verdict.”
• appellate courts not to weigh evidence or evaluate credibility of witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).