· 1/12/2011
McKinstry v. Sergent
Citations
- 442 B.R. 567
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3211
- 2011 WL 94606
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the bankruptcy court is best situated to determine abstention issues, including “whether those claims are ‘core’ bankruptcy claims”
- noting 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) “makes no distinction between pre- and post-confirmation jurisdiction”
- “Any one of [arising-under, arising-in, or related-to jurisdiction] will suffice”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amul R. Thapar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.