Skip to main content
· 1/12/2011

McKinstry v. Sergent

Citations

  • 442 B.R. 567
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3211
  • 2011 WL 94606

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the bankruptcy court is best situated to determine abstention issues, including “whether those claims are ‘core’ bankruptcy claims”
  • noting 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) “makes no distinction between pre- and post-confirmation jurisdiction”
  • “Any one of [arising-under, arising-in, or related-to jurisdiction] will suffice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amul R. Thapar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.