D. New Jersey· 7/24/2009

McKinnon v. Gonzales

Citations

642 F. Supp. 2d 410
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67406
2009 WL 2338381

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that warden’s comments that plaintiff was skating on thin ice and that he was either with management or against them were not materially adverse acts that were actionable as part of a Title VII retaliation claim
noting that “it is well-settled that difficult or stressful working conditions are not tantamount to a ‘hostile’ work environment” (internal quotation omitted)
finding “intensified” supervision of plaintiff, micromanaging of plaintiff’s whereabouts, and “accosting” and “harassing” plaintiff about time and attendance matters did not constitute adverse employment actions
“Minor changes in duties or working conditions, even unpalatable or unwelcome ones, which cause no materially 18 significant disadvantage do not satisfy the prong.” (internal citations omitted)
listing Title VII retaliation prima facie elements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Simandle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.