McKinney v. Yawn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing order denying discharge for speedy trial violation under writ of prohibition, citing Sherrod, 427 So.2d at 163
• defendant not entitled to discharge when he took inconsistent positions by seeking continuance and telling court he would be ready for trial in May when speedy trial ran in April
• “Under rule 3.191, once the defendant files [the notice of expiration], it is the prosecution’s burden to schedule a hearing within five days and come forward with a showing that the defendant is not entitled to discharge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).