McKinney v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that turning away rapidly upon seeing officers would be factor in determining reasonable suspicion
• noting that evidence that drugs are normally exchanged in a manner similar to the transaction at issue would be factor in determining reasonable suspicion
• stopping car in area of high narcotics activity valid factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hill v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-01-08· cited 229×
• Guzman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-05-22· cited 169×
• Lingo v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-12-03· cited 59×
• S.B.C. Matter Of
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1991-01-31· cited 42×
• Wamget v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-09-12· cited 39×
• Rector v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-06-06· cited 35×
• Strozier v. Clark
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-10-30· cited 33×
• Moore v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1991-09-25· cited 27×
• Guzman v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2000-05-04· cited 20×
• State v. Ellington
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-02-26· cited 20×
• State v. Gill
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-07-17· cited 10×
• Sheppard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1995-02-23· cited 7×
• Matter of SBC
  Tex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 1991-04-04
• Lee Darain Scott v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2008-06-19
• George Martinez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2005-07-28