McKinney v. McDonald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing VA's policy found in the M21-1 prior to promulgation of the final regulation
• “[T]he issue before us is not whether the VA could have assigned a retroactive effective date to the 2011 regula- tion, but rather, whether the VA acted arbitrarily and capriciously in assigning a prospective date.”
• “Under [38 U.S.C. § 502], we have jurisdiction to review the VA’s procedural and substantive rules, any amendments to those rules, and the process in which those rules are made or amended.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).