McKinney v. Allstate Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that similar language was “not ambiguous and clearly limit[ed] all claims arising out of [person’s] death to a single [per person] limit”
• holding a limitation on damages arising out of bodily injury to one person involved in an accident applies to all claims arising from the death of that person
• finding that the limitation of liability clause in the policy was not ambiguous and clearly limited all plaintiff’s survival and wrongful-death claims arising out of the insured’s death to a single [per person] limit
• overruling Stearns because the court \found an ambiguity where none existed\
• overruling Stearns because the court “found an ambiguity where none existed”
• “per person” limit of liability clause “clearly limited” all claims arising out of the decedent’s death to a single per person limit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).