McKinley v. L. & N. R. R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Further, M & R’s motion relies in part on documents that are in the Italian language. The 23 documents are not translated into English by any person shown to be a competent translator. 24 Thus, the documents are not admissible and cannot be considered.”
• “Further, M & R’s motion relies in part on documents that are in the Italian language. The 23 documents are not translated into English by any person shown to be a competent translator. 24 Thus, the documents are not admissible and cannot be considered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).