McKinley v. Coliseum Health Group, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that parol evidence was admissible to explain undefined terms in a contract that “were ambiguous and required explanation”
• “The construction placed upon a contract by the parties thereto, as shown by their acts and conduct, is entitled to much weight and may be conclusive upon them.”
• ambiguity in contract resolved \based on the rules of contract construction and parol evidence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).