McKinley Creek Mining Co. v. Alaska United Mining Co.
Citations
- 183 U.S. 563
- 22 S. Ct. 84
- 46 L. Ed. 331
- 1902 U.S. LEXIS 733
- 1 Alaska Fed. 713
Syllabus
<p>There is no prejudicial error in the ruling of the court below on the admission of testimony.</p> <p>Assignments of error cannot be based upon instructions given or refused in an equity suit.</p> <p>The locations are valid so far as they depend upon the discovery of gold.</p> <p>The notices as set forth in the opinion of the court constituted a sufficient location.</p> <p>Grantees of public land take by purchase.</p> <p>In Manuel v. Wolff, 152 U. S. 505, it was decided that a location by an alien was voidable, not void, and was free from attack by any one exkept the Government.</p>
Judges: McKenna
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.