McKesson Drug Co. v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellate review of JCC’s rejection of EMA opinion is limited to whether CSE supports JCC’s finding of clear and convincing evidence
• appellate court's function is not to conduct a de novo proceeding and reweigh the evidence to determine independently if it satisfies the clear-and-convincing standard, but simply to determine whether the record contains CSE to support such a finding
• claimants are now bound to demonstrate mental injuries by clear and convincing evidence, i.e., evidence of a quality and character designed to produce in the mind of a JCC a firm belief or conviction, without hesitation, as to the truth of the allegations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).