McKesson Corp. v. Islamic Republic of Iran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• using the prime rate where no circumstances in that case supported a departure from Forman
• expert's valuation testimony admissible although he conceded that, in performing his valuation, he had violated the ethics rules established in USPAP
• “[T]he Tribunal has never awarded compound interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).