McKesson Corp. v. Derdiger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a record date that preceded the annual meeting by 61 days was invalid under Section 213(a)
• declining to conclude that certain actions taken in reliance on Section 213 were valid because to excuse compliance with a clear statute would undermine “the requirement that counsel be held to the highest standards of professional attentiveness as expected by their clients”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).