McKernan v. The Association of Apartment Owners of Kamaole Sands

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting “intervention for the unique purpose of contesting the disclosure of private, confidential files and issues relating to this interest,” as requested in motion to intervene
• allowing non-party priests to intervene in the litigation to protest production of their personnel records on the alleged grounds that the records are protected from disclosure by the United States Constitution, the state constitution, state statutes, and the common law
• reversing judgment denying motion to intervene and directing “the seven priests on remand are to be granted intervention for the unique purpose of contesting the disclosure of private, confidential files and issues relating to this interest”
• \A court also has the authority to dismiss intervenors once their interest in the matter has expired. Federal cases illustrate that intervention as of right does not grant absolute entitlement to continue as a party until termination of the suit.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).