McKeown v. Com., Dept. of Transp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• PennDOT is only required to notify a licensee at his “address of record”
• trial court’s grant of a nunc pro tunc appeal goes to its subject matter jurisdiction; issues of subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time, even on appeal, by the parties or by the court on its own- motion
• trial court’s grant of a nunc pro tunc appeal goes to its subject matter jurisdiction; issues of subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time, even on appeal, by the parties or by the court on its own motion
• “The record is devoid of any evidence that McKeown made any arrangements to have his mail forwarded to him while he was incarcerated. Accordingly, the trial court erred by finding that McKeown’s appeal was timely and by denying the Department’s motion to quash.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).