McKeown Distributors, Inc. v. Gyp-Crete Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that a franchisor’s violation of the CFA’s notice provision “at most would entitle [the franchisee] to recover lost profits for the . . . days it would have been in operation prior to the date that termination would be permitted under the [CFA]”
• absence of the term “franchise” in agreement is relevant to determination of franchise under the Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).