Skip to main content

McKenzie v. State

Citations

  • 642 S.E.2d 187
  • 283 Ga. App. 555

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where totality of the evidence was sufficient to connect the defendant to possession of drugs, the jury’s verdict will be sustained
  • where totality of the evidence was sufficient to connect the defendant to possession of drugs, the jury’s verdict will be sustained
  • a defendant’s possession of a large amount of cash is circumstantial evidence of a drug trafficking offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phipps, Smith, Ruffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.