McKenzie v. Federal Express Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant “violated Labor Code Section 226(a)(6) by failing to include the beginning date for the pay period in its wage statements”
• holding that the defendant “violated Labor Code Section 226(a)(6) by failing to include the beginning date for the pay period in its wage statements”
• holding that an employer violated section 226(a)(8) by failing to include its address on its wage statements even where employer included the address on the checks attached to the statements
• employee suffered injury as she was required to refer to either a calendar, employer manual, or work- schedule to verify days of work included in a wage statement missing a start date
• right to receive information 27 under statute amounted to intangible injury insufficient to confer standing under the UCL
• “FedEx contends that because the requirement to include date ranges on a wage statement does not pertain to ‘conditions of labor’ or ‘hours of work,’ as required by Section 1198, this cause of action fails. The Court, agrees.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).