McKenny v. John v. Carr & Son, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting mere expression of hope is not sufficiently definite to give rise to claim for promissory estoppel in employment context
• “Vermont courts have consistently held that it is for a jury to determine whether a handbook has established contractual rights.”
• “The theory of detrimental reliance applies when the promise comes first and induces the subsequent action in reliance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).