McKenney v. Commission on Judicial Conduct

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Commission on Judicial Conduct has no authority to investigate alleged judicial misconduct until a complaint has been filed with it
• Commission on Judicial Conduct has no authority to investigate alleged judicial misconduct until a complaint has been filed with it
• postenactment affidavit of House Chairman of Committee on Judiciary is not relevant legislative history
• evidence of statements attributed to individual legislators as to their motives in considering legislation are not an appropriate source from which to discover the intent of the legislation
• postenactment affidavit of House Chairman of Committee on Judiciary is not relevant legislative history
• state law requiring complaint to be signed under pains and penalties of perjury does not require signer to have personal knowledge; however, lack of first hand knowledge could have bearing on whether complaint is worthy of investigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).