Nevada Supreme Court· 1/28/1982
McKenna v. State
Citations
- 639 P.2d 557
- 98 Nev. 38
- 1982 Nev. LEXIS 380
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the Fifth SUPREME CDURT OF NEVADA 6 (0) 1947A Amendment prohibits the State from using a defendant's confidential statements made during a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation to obtain a conviction
- fundamental unfairness, amounting to violation of the defendant's right to due process, for district court to permit court-appointed psychiatrist who examined the defendant to testify as to admissions the defendant made during that examination
- fundamental unfairness, amounting to violation of the defendant’s right to due process, for district court to permit court-appointed psychiatrist who examined the defendant to tes tify as to admissions the defendant made during that examination
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gunderson, Manoukian, Springer, Mowbray, Zenoff
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. FeldeSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1982-10-18· cited 94×
- McKenna v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1985-08-27· cited 35×
- Brown v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-02-26· cited 33×
- Alward v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1996-02-29· cited 28×
- Dzul v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2002-10-31· cited 24×
- Winiarz v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1988-03-31· cited 11×
- Fletcher (Katherine) v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2022-08-25
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.