McKeithan v. Boarman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff’s failure to object to agency’s decision to reject claim “supports a finding that a plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to” said claim
• holding plaintiff abandoned religious and gender discrimination and retaliation claims when EEO’s acceptance of complaint identified only age discrimination claim
• finding that plaintiff’s “failure to respond to the [agency’s] framing of the issue supports a finding that a plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to those claims not approved by the EEO”
• dismissing plaintiff’s hostile work environment claim because he “offer[ed] nothing to support a claim that any of [supervisor]’s conduct was linked to his age”
• dismissing retaliation claim for failure to exhaust when plaintiff failed to include it in his administrative complaint or any allegations that could be construed as a retaliation claim
• finding retaliation claim unexhausted where plaintiff did not argue that the “administrative complaint could be interpreted to raise a retaliation claim” and did not object to agency’s omission of retaliation claim from its notice of acceptance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).