· 5/30/1989
McKee v. City of Edmonds
Citations
- 773 P.2d 434
- 54 Wash. App. 265
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \[a] county has a duty to maintain its highways in a reasonably safe condition for its users\
- interpreting Hansen as qualifying municipalities’ duty to apply only to those using roadways in proper manner
- finding that city had provided adequate cross-walks
- municipality does not owe a duty of care to make the street safe for jaywalkers
- no duty to protect jaywalkers from falling in holes when safe crosswalks are provided
- no duty to protect jaywalkers from falling in holes when safe crosswalks are provided
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Webster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.