Skip to main content
· 5/30/1989

McKee v. City of Edmonds

Citations

  • 773 P.2d 434
  • 54 Wash. App. 265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \[a] county has a duty to maintain its highways in a reasonably safe condition for its users\
  • interpreting Hansen as qualifying municipalities’ duty to apply only to those using roadways in proper manner
  • finding that city had provided adequate cross-walks
  • municipality does not owe a duty of care to make the street safe for jaywalkers
  • no duty to protect jaywalkers from falling in holes when safe crosswalks are provided
  • no duty to protect jaywalkers from falling in holes when safe crosswalks are provided

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Webster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.