McKay v. Ingleson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an argument first raised during oral argument was waived “[b]ecause [it] was not raised clearly and distinctly in the opening brief”
• stating that 5 where an “argument was not raised clearly and distinctly in the opening brief, it has been 6 waived”
• reasoning that arguments not raised “clearly and distinctly” in the opening brief are forfeited
• stating 5 that where an “argument was not raised clearly and distinctly in the opening brief, it has 6 been waived”
• stating 5 that where an “argument was not raised clearly and distinctly in the opening brief, it has 6 been waived”
• “Because this argument was not raised clearly and distinctly in the opening brief, it has been waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).