McKay v. Guez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing prosecution history disclaimer, including that qualifying statements “can take the form of either amendment or argument”
• An applicant “can challenge an examiner’s characterization [of the claims] in order to avoid any chance for disclaimer.... ”
• \[T]he entirety of a patent's file history captures the public record of the patentee's representations concerning the scope and meaning of the claims.\
• “[T]he entirety of a patent’s file history captures the public record of the patentee’s representations concerning the scope and meaning of the claims.”
• “Our cases make clear, however, that where found, prosecution history disclaimer can overcome the presumption of claim differentiation.”
• “Our cases make clear, however, that where found, prosecution history disclaimer can overcome the presumption of claim differentiation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).