McKay v. BD. OF COM'RS OF DOUGLAS CTY.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no explicit exception to state’s open meetings statute for attorney-client communications and that it was not for court to determine what legislature should have done
• explaining that when a statute is silent, \it is not the business of this court to fill in alleged legislative omissions based on conjecture as to what the [L]egislature would or should have done\
• explaining that when a statute is silent, \it is not the business of this court to fill in alleged legislative omissions based on conjecture as to what the [L]egislature would or should have done\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).