McKay Nissan, Ltd. v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing whether the Illinois Motor Vehicle Franchise Act applied to a franchise agreement where the old agreement predated the Act but its amended versions did not
• “A determination that the Act does not apply to the 1979 agreement and amendments does not fully dispose of McKay’s complaint, however. The parties entered into a renewal agreement on April 3, 1989, long after the Act (and any relevant amendments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).