McIsaac v. Ford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing action, even though defendants were served mere two or three days after 120-day period ended
• court notes that three defendants were served only two or three days late, but does not directly address the factor
• “Last minute attempts at service, absent some explanatory justification, do not establish good cause.”
• court holds that, absent timely motion for extension of time, court will not entertain request for discretionary extension of time for service of process, even where statute of limitations will bar refiling

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).