Skip to main content
· 12/17/1910

McIntyre v. Emerson

Citations

  • 132 S.W. 947
  • 1910 Tex. App. LEXIS 936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a trial court cannot ignore relevant evidence when the fundamental liberty interest in maintaining a relationship with one’s child is at stake
  • holding that a trial court cannot ignore relevant evidence when the fundamental liberty interest in maintaining a relationship with one’s child is at stake

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bookhout

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.