McIndoe v. Huntington Ingalls Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Chance had not been in post-removal- 23 order detention longer than the presumptively reasonable six-month period set forth in [Zadvydas]. Consequently, the district court did not err in finding that his challenge to his 24 continued post removal detention was premature.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).