MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. The United States, and at & T Communications, Inc. And Us Sprint Communications Company, Intervenors-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the opportunity to qualify either as an actual or a prospective bidder ends when the proposal period ends____”
• construing nearly identical definition of “interested party” under predecessor statute and concluding that an offeror who “deliberately chose to be only a subcontractor and not to submit its own proposal” could not achieve “prospective bidderhood”
• construing nearly identical definition of “interested party” under predecessor statute and concluding that an offeror who “deliberately chose to be only a subcontractor and not to submit its own proposal” could not achieve “prospective bidderhood”
• construing “interested party” under 40 U.S.C. § 759(f)(9)(B) (repealed 1996)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).