Skip to main content
· 12/14/1992

MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Garden State Investment Corporation, Doing Business as Adventures in Achievement

Citations

  • 981 F.2d 385
  • 71 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 1212
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 32436
  • 1992 WL 364097

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “federal tariffs are the law, not mere contracts”
  • “Section 414 preserves causes of action for breaches of duties that are not created under the Communications Act.” (emphasis added)
  • “ Because the service relationship . . . arises under the Communications Act and the tariff required by the Act, we conclude the district court had subject matter jurisdiction over [the] lawsuit under 28 U.S.C. § 1337(a
  • “[F]ederal tariffs are the law, not mere contracts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibson, Fagg, Bowman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.