MCI CONSTRUCTORS, LLC v. City of Greensboro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that vacatur under the Federal Arbitration Act based on an allegation of “undue means” requires that the fraud or corruption be established by clear and convincing evidence
• “As long as the arbitrator ] [is] even arguably construing or applying the contract, ... [the] award[] will not be disturbed.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• counsel’s “legally objectionable” arguments not sufficient to vacate award under § 10(a)(1)
• “[A]s long as the arbitrator is even arguably construing or applying the contract and acting within the scope of his authority, that a court is convinced he committed serious error does not suffice to overturn his decision.”
• applying doctrine to aspects of contract related to “damages claim”
• applying doctrine to aspects of contract related to “damages claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).