· 10/14/1955
McHargue v. Fayette Coal & Feed Company
Citations
- 283 S.W.2d 170
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding reliance on stock-feed salesman's representation was not reasonable when the plaintiff was an experienced dairyman and agricultural chemist
- \`sales talk' or `puffing' which is universal and an expected practice\
- \'sales tall? or 'puffing which is universal and an expected practice\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stanley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.