Skip to main content
· 10/14/1955

McHargue v. Fayette Coal & Feed Company

Citations

  • 283 S.W.2d 170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding reliance on stock-feed salesman's representation was not reasonable when the plaintiff was an experienced dairyman and agricultural chemist
  • \`sales talk' or `puffing' which is universal and an expected practice\
  • \'sales tall? or 'puffing which is universal and an expected practice\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stanley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.