Skip to main content
· 3/31/1998

McGuire v. Turnbo

Citations

  • 137 F.3d 321
  • 40 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 551
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 6447
  • 1998 WL 113490

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “a complaint will relate back under Rule 15(c) when the district court has enlarged Rule 4(m)’s notice period”
  • noting that the Rule 4(m) period referenced in Rule 15(c)(1)(C) includes “any extension the court may grant” for service
  • instructing that “to sue successfully under the FTCA, a plaintiff must name the United States as the sole defendant”
  • allowing amended complaint substituting the United States for federal employees to relate back where the United States received timely notice
  • service timely where plaintiff served defendant within court’s extended deadline, nearly two years after filing suit
  • “To sue successfully under the FTCA, a plaintiff must name the United States as the sole defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Duhé, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.