McGuire v. Ryland Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[a] party who fails to present its strong est case in the first instance generally has no right to raise new theories or arguments in a motion for reconsideration”
• “A party who fails to present its strongest case in the first instance generally has no right to raise new theories or arguments in a motion for reconsideration.”
• reconsideration is usually justified by (i) an intervening change in controlling law; (ii) the availability of new evidence; or (ii) the need to correct clear error or manifest injustice
• “A party who fails to present its strongest case in the first instance generally has no right to raise new theories or arguments in a motion for reconsideration.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).