Nebraska Court of Appeals· 10/1/2002
McGuire v. McGuire
Citations
- 652 N.W.2d 293
- 11 Neb. Ct. App. 433
- 2002 Neb. App. LEXIS 257
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating “[a] marital debt is ‘one incurred during marriage and before date of separation by either spouse or both spouses for joint benefit of parties’”
- burden of proof to show that debt is nonmarital remains with person making that assertion
- burden of proof to show that debt is nonmarital remains with person making that assertion
- burden of proof to show that debt is nonmarital remains with person making that assertion
- marital debt is one incurred during marriage and before date of separation by either spouse or both spouses for joint benefit of parties
- where evidence is in conflict on material issue of fact, appellate court considers and may give weight to fact that trial judge heard and observed witnesses and accepted one version of facts rather than another
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Irwin, Hannon, Inbody
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Millatmal v. MillatmalNebraska Supreme Court· 2006-10-27· cited 153×
- Coffey v. CoffeyNebraska Court of Appeals· 2003-05-13· cited 117×
- Gebhardt v. GebhardtNebraska Court of Appeals· 2008-03-11· cited 61×
- Walters v. WaltersNebraska Court of Appeals· 2004-01-13· cited 42×
- Cook v. CookNebraska Court of Appeals· 2018-07-31· cited 34×
- Vanderveer v. VanderveerNebraska Supreme Court· 2021-09-24· cited 16×
- Malin v. LoynachanNebraska Court of Appeals· 2007-07-10· cited 11×
- Velehradsky v. VelehradskyNebraska Court of Appeals· 2004-11-02· cited 9×
- Hughes v. HughesNebraska Court of Appeals· 2005-11-22· cited 5×
- Theisen v. TheisenNebraska Court of Appeals· 2006-01-31· cited 4×
- Schmidt v. ParkertNebraska Court of Appeals· 2017-05-23
- Mitchell v. MitchellNebraska Court of Appeals· 2018-03-20
- Uhrich v. UhrichNebraska Court of Appeals· 2019-01-22
- Riegel v. LemondNebraska Court of Appeals· 2019-07-09
- Holen v. HolenNebraska Court of Appeals· 2019-12-31
- Purvis v. PurvisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-11-16
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Davidson v. DavidsonNebraska Supreme Court· 1998-05-22· cited 170×
- Meints v. MeintsNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-03-17· cited 130×
- Heald v. HealdNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-06-02· cited 127×
- Reichert v. ReichertNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-05-27· cited 93×
- Parde v. PardeNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-11-12· cited 89×
- Buche v. BucheNebraska Supreme Court· 1988-05-27· cited 86×
- Wright v. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals· 1999-09-07· cited 64×
- Zetterman v. ZettermanNebraska Supreme Court· 1994-03-04· cited 60×
- Brunges v. BrungesNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-11-03· cited 55×
- Jirkovsky v. JirkovskyNebraska Supreme Court· 1995-01-06· cited 52×
- Thiltges v. ThiltgesNebraska Supreme Court· 1995-02-10· cited 51×
- Hardy v. HardyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-04-15· cited 47×
- Preston v. PrestonNebraska Supreme Court· 1992-07-31· cited 47×
- Walker v. WalkerNebraska Court of Appeals· 2000-10-17· cited 46×
- In Re Estate of MithoferNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-07-09· cited 45×
- Tyma v. TymaNebraska Supreme Court· 2002-05-17· cited 44×
- Hajenga v. HajengaNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-10-15· cited 42×
- Schweizer v. SchweizerCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-12-04· cited 37×
- Mathew v. PalmerNebraska Court of Appeals· 1999-02-09· cited 30×
- Hickum v. HickumCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-10-30· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.