Skip to main content
· 4/20/2015

McGuire v. Jones

Citations

  • 135 S. Ct. 1849
  • 191 L. Ed. 2d 731

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘‘[H]andwriting expert testimony is not a necessary requisite to a forgery conviction, and such analysis may be left to the jury_”
  • “an appellant is bound to submit arguments in support of the issues presented, supported by legal authorities and applied to the facts reflected on the record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.