Skip to main content
· 1/31/2000

McGuiggan v. CPC International, Inc.

Citations

  • 84 F. Supp. 2d 470
  • 7 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1366
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1165
  • 2000 WL 146022

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In short, if the Plaintiff] [was] in business for [himself], [he] was not [an] employee[ ].”
  • motor carrier exemption applied to drivers who delivered English muffins, baked out-of-state, to intrastate customers pursuant to specific orders
  • “In short, if the Plaintiff[ ][was] in business for [himself], [he] was not [an] employee!]; [i]f [he] was economically dependent on and within the direct control of [the Company], [he] was [an] employee! ].”
  • uncontested facts showed that the New York plaintiffs and 4 the defendant’s New York customers called orders into the defendant’s New Jersey bakery, 5 which delivered the orders to the New York warehouse where the plaintiffs picked up the 6 products for delivery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMAHON

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.